Site Search
Results 15 - 21 of 41
Format: Presentations
Performance Indicators As a Tool for Measuring Progress Toward a SiMRThis presentation provides guidance on the evaluation of SSIP by differentiating between evaluating implementation and impact and reviews possible measures of progress toward achieving the SIMR. Participants discussed and provided input into development of an IDC white paper on the topic. Currently, the white paper is in draft form and undergoing revisions based on input from the field. The published paper will be posted to the IDC Resource Library and affiliated as a related resource to the handout already posted for this session.
Format: Presentations
Developing a Logic Model for Your SSIP EvaluationThis presentation focuses on the role that developing a logic model has in overall SSIP evaluation planning.
Format: Presentations
State Part B Teams Discuss Their Experiences With the SSIP and SIMR ProcessThe presentation focuses on experiences of State Part B teams in analyzing data, selecting their SIMR, and completing their SSIP. Guiding questions help states connect Phase I and Phase II planning.
Format: Presentations
Using Implementation Science in Phases II and IIIUse of implementation science is critical in planning and implementing systemic improvement. This information explores how to operationalize the components of implementation science and how to select, implement, and scale-up chosen evidence-based practices. Helpful handouts are included.
Format: Presentations
Beyond PR: Stakeholders as AlliesThis presentation can help SEAs learn about perspectives on stakeholders as allies and formulate essential questions to consider as they implement Phases II and III of the SSIP.
Format: Presentations
Understanding Phase II Evaluation RequirementsThe presentation reviews OSEP’s requirements for the evaluation of the SSIP.
Format: Recordings
Part B State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report 2016 Indicator AnalysesThe Part B State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report 2016 Indicator Analyses presents a national picture of the implementation of IDEA based on a review of information 60 states and jurisdictions reported in their FFY 2014 APRs and amended SPPs that they subsubmitted to OSEP in spring of 2016.